Dolphin{anty} vs Dolphin{cloud}: Two Products, Two Jobs — Which One You Actually Need

Dolphin Anty vs Dolphin Cloud is a comparison nobody wrote, and the gap costs people money. Dolphin ships two products with almost the same name: Dolphin{anty} is an anti-detect browser you install on your machine, and Dolphin{cloud} is a cloud panel for Facebook ad accounts. They live on different domains, they are sold on different pricing pages, they solve different problems, and a good number of people buy the wrong one because the names are one syllable apart.

Search engines have the same problem. Queries about the anti-detect browser regularly land on pages about the Facebook panel, and the other way round — including on our own review of Dolphin Cloud, which people reach while looking for the browser.

Quick answer: Dolphin{anty} is an anti-detect browser — it creates browser profiles with separate fingerprints and proxies so many accounts can live on one machine. Dolphin{cloud} is a cloud panel for Facebook advertising — it launches and manages campaigns across many FB ad accounts without opening Ads Manager. They are separate purchases and they connect through a token.

So: what each product is, what each one is genuinely good at, how the two connect, and how to work out which job you are actually trying to do.

The short version

Both sites read 29 August 2026.

If you only remember one line: Anty is about who the browser looks like. Cloud is about what happens inside the ad accounts once you are in.

Dolphin{anty}: the identity layer

Dolphin{anty} is an anti-detect browser. Its homepage describes it as a browser "that helps you earn money" for managing "any number of accounts for advertising platforms and social networks, web-scraping, marketing, affiliate and more", and it puts its own counter on the page: 860,000 people and 2,200 teams (dolphin-anty.com, read 29 August 2026).

What it actually does, in the vocabulary of the product itself:

Profiles with their own fingerprint. Each profile is a separate browser identity. The site advertises one-click creation using pre-collected fingerprints, and manual control over 20 parameters if you want to build your own. Recent additions on the page include device name spoofing, webcam spoofing, and deeper handling of WebGL, WebGPU, ClientHints and Voices.

Proxies, as first-class objects. Profiles carry proxies. The documentation carries integration pages for a long list of proxy vendors — NodeMaven, ASocks, ResiProx, ThorData, NaProxy, FloppyData, 911Proxy, plus SOCKS handling.

Cloud sync, with an off switch. Profiles, cookies and extensions sync so you can pick up on another machine — and the site explicitly advertises the ability to disable cloud sync and keep profiles local. That off switch is a more thoughtful feature than it looks, and it is worth noticing that they built it.

Team access without shared passwords. This is the part media buyers care about most. You can transfer and share profiles, share proxies and cookies, set permissions per profile or per folder (create, edit, delete, duplicate, transfer), let profiles inherit folder permissions, and cap how many profiles a given user can create.

Automation. A script builder for browser scenarios on Windows, Linux and macOS. A profile synchronizer, marked beta, that repeats the master profile's actions across the others. And a local API, which has its own article: see what the Dolphin{anty} API can and cannot automate.

That is a coherent product with a clear boundary. The boundary is the browser. A profile knows what a website sees; it does not know what a campaign spent.

Dolphin{cloud}: the Facebook operations layer

Dolphin{cloud} is a different animal. Its page title is literally "one multi-tool for your FB media buying team", and the tagline underneath is "Adapted for FB media buyers with love and care" (cloud.dolphin.tech, read 29 August 2026).

It is a cloud panel. You upload Facebook accounts into it and then work on them without going into Ads Manager. From the feature list on the page:

Bulk campaign creation. Create, duplicate and launch ad sets across any number of accounts. Objectives listed include clicks, conversions, target views, fan page promotion, app installs and in-app events, with deep links. Their own headline for this is "Launch 50 FB ad accounts while you drink coffee".

Automatic creative uniqueness at launch. The page states it plainly: creatives are uniqued during the launch. On their pricing table this sits on the Pro tier.

Account and BM plumbing. This is the part nobody else writes down: creating Business Managers, invite links, confirming BM email, creating and linking pixels, creating fan pages, auto-publishing and sharing them, linking and unlinking Instagram, binding cards three ways, changing billing country, setting spend limits, moving accounts between teammates.

Auto-rules. Rules on accounts and rules on campaigns, on the four paid tiers, plus automated review of rejected ads on the top two.

Comment moderation. Filtering, hiding or deleting comments under ads, by stop-words or by hand.

Tracker integrations. Keitaro and Binom, with export of unique clicks and GEO to Keitaro and import from either, plus postbacks from trackers and servers to attribute revenue to leads.

Team roles. Admin down to Farmer, with statistics per team member on spend, income and profit.

Look at that list again and notice what it is: it is an ad operations product. It just happens to be an ad operations product for exactly one platform.

Why the two get confused, and why it matters

The confusion is not the market being careless. It has three real causes.

One brand, two products, one syllable. "Dolphin Anty" and "Dolphin Cloud" are close enough that search engines return one for the other, and close enough that a colleague's recommendation — "just use Dolphin" — is ambiguous.

They ship a bridge between them. Dolphin{anty}'s homepage advertises "Integration with dolphin{cloud}" as a new feature: transfer profiles to Cloud in a couple of clicks. The documentation describes the older path, through an extension added automatically to profiles created with the "FB" type, plus a token you copy from Cloud's Settings ("Access token to your Dolphin") and paste into Anty's Settings under "Integration with Dolphin". Reasonable people conclude these are one product with two halves. They are not — they are two subscriptions with a handshake.

Both are sold to the same buyer. Affiliate and media-buying teams running Facebook at volume are the target of both pages. The audience overlaps almost perfectly; the products do not overlap at all.

Why it matters: the two failure modes are expensive in opposite directions. Buy Anty when your problem was bulk launching, and you will still be clicking through Ads Manager account by account, only now with better fingerprints. Buy Cloud when your problem was account isolation, and you will have a bulk launcher pointed at accounts you cannot safely keep apart on one machine.

How to tell which one you need

Answer the question that describes your worst hour of the week.

"I cannot keep these logins separate." You are opening accounts in incognito windows, on a second laptop, on a colleague's machine. You are passing passwords in a chat. Somebody logged into the wrong account again. → Dolphin{anty}. This is exactly what it was built for, and it is good at it.

"I am doing the same thing thirty times." You are inside the accounts already. You are creating the same campaign, one at a time, in Ads Manager, and it takes your morning. → Dolphin{cloud}, if all thirty are Facebook.

"I do not know which of these is making money." Your spend is in one place, your revenue is in your tracker, and nothing joins them. → Neither. That is a third layer, and we will come to it.

"All three." Then all three, and that is a normal stack, not a contradiction.

The honest limits of each

Every product has an edge. These are theirs, described rather than judged.

Dolphin{anty} has no idea what a campaign is. It is a browser. It cannot tell you what you spent yesterday, because the concept does not exist inside it. Their API takes a profile ID; it has never seen a campaign ID.

Dolphin{cloud} is one platform deep. Every entity it manipulates is a Meta entity: BMs, fan pages, pixels, ad accounts, campaigns, ad sets, ads. That is not a gap — it is a design decision, and the depth on Meta is the return you get for it. But it means the answer to "how did Google do this week" lives somewhere else.

Both are priced per user. On Cloud's published table, Base adds $20/month per additional user and Pro adds $30/month per additional user (cloud.dolphin.tech, 29 August 2026). Team growth is a line item. Worth pricing before you scale a buying team.

The third layer, and why it is a different question

Here is the part where we say who we are, because you are reading this on our blog and you should know what we sell.

Wevion is a campaign operations platform on the ad platforms' own APIs. We are not an anti-detect browser and we are not going to build one. We have no fingerprint layer, no proxies, no browser profiles, and no plan to have them. That is genuinely another trade — Dolphin does it, we do not, and there is no version of our roadmap where we start.

What we do sit on is the layer above the ad account, across more than one platform:

Six platforms, connected the same way. Meta, Google, TikTok, Taboola, Snapchat and Outbrain — connect, launch, sync and measure on all six, via OAuth on the official APIs. No cookies, no browser automation.

And the numbers under that, told before the demo rather than after. Budget moves driven by the rules engine run on five platforms — Outbrain has no branch there. Rules that compare one platform against another run on four: Meta, Google, TikTok, Taboola. Pause and activate at ad-set and ad level: three — Meta, TikTok, Snapchat. Launch rollback and relaunch: Meta only. Saying six for everything would be easier and it would be wrong.

Rules that read margin, not just ROAS. The rules engine runs on a 15-minute cadence with 33 condition metrics, and among them are profit, profit_margin, true_roas and break_even_roas — so a rule can act on contribution margin instead of on platform-reported return.

An asymmetric brake. Stopping autonomy halts activations, budget increases and relaunches, and deliberately lets pause and budget decrease keep running. The safe direction stays open when you pull the handle.

Budget Pools. One daily budget, campaigns from several platforms inside it, redistributed every eight hours — with a simulation you can look at before it runs and an allocation log after.

Ten tracker adapters. BeMob, Binom, ClickFlare, Everflow, ExoClick, Keitaro, RedTrack, SearchFeed, TrafficManager, Voluum. Note that Dolphin{cloud} integrates Keitaro and Binom too — the trackers are common ground, not a battleground.

Roles and a record. Organization → team → workspace → access groups, with an audit log you can query in plain language: who changed that budget, and when.

And the things we do not have, said here rather than discovered later:

• No creative uniqueization at launch. Dolphin{cloud} puts it in its feature list and on its pricing table. We do not have it, in any form.
• Launch rollback is Meta-only. On the other five platforms there is no undo for a bulk launch.
• No element-level creative tagging — hook, frame, CTA as separate objects. Several creative-analytics tools do this. We do not.
• Seats on the entry plan are the harshest step in our pricing. On Starter you cannot buy additional seats at all. If you are a growing team, look at that before anything else.

The stack, drawn out

For a team running Facebook at volume across many accounts, the layers stack like this:

1. Identity — Dolphin{anty}. Profiles, fingerprints, proxies, team access without shared credentials.
2. Facebook operations at volume — Dolphin{cloud}. Bulk launch into many FB accounts, BM and fan page plumbing, comment moderation, creative uniqueness.
3. Cross-platform campaign operations and margin — a platform on the official APIs. Rules on a cadence, one budget across platforms, revenue from your tracker sitting next to spend, contribution margin down to the individual ad.

Layer 1 gets you in. Layer 2 makes Facebook fast. Layer 3 answers "and did any of it make money, on all six platforms, including the ones no browser profile ever touches".

Different layers of the same stack — which is why plenty of teams keep all of them.

What to do next

• If you are picking between the two Dolphins: use the "worst hour of the week" test above. Login chaos → Anty. Repetitive launching on Facebook → Cloud. Open both pricing pages the day you decide; they move.
• If you want to understand the bridge between them: read what the Dolphin{cloud} browser extension does and where it stops.
• If you are the technical one on the team: what the Dolphin{anty} API can automate walks the actual endpoints.
• If your problem is the third layer: try Wevion on the free plan. Connecting an ad account is an OAuth click — nothing to migrate, because the campaigns live on the platforms. Keep Dolphin exactly where it is.